Skip to content
AuditFront
Art.26.1 NIS2

NIS2 Art.26.1: Supervision of Essential Entities

What This Control Requires

Member States shall ensure that the supervisory or enforcement measures imposed on essential entities in respect of the obligations laid down in this Directive are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, taking into account the circumstances of each individual case.

In Plain Language

If your organisation is classified as an essential entity, regulators can - and will - come knocking without waiting for something to go wrong. Unlike important entities that face reactive supervision, essential entities are subject to proactive, ongoing oversight: on-site inspections, off-site reviews, targeted security audits, and regular compliance checks. Supervisory powers are broad. Authorities can request evidence of your cybersecurity measures, access your documentation, demand information to assess compliance, and order specific corrective actions. There is no waiting for a trigger event. The practical implication is that you need to be audit-ready at all times. Treat supervision as a chance to validate and improve your security posture rather than an adversarial exercise. Organisations that engage constructively with regulators consistently have better outcomes.

How to Implement

Assign clear ownership for regulatory interactions, whether that is a dedicated compliance function or a named individual. This person needs to understand the supervisory framework, keep readiness levels up, and coordinate responses to regulatory requests. Keep your compliance documentation comprehensive, current, and auditable. Build a compliance evidence repository organised by NIS2 control area so you can pull together an evidence pack at short notice rather than scrambling when an inspection is announced. Create an inspection readiness programme. Maintain a standing file of key compliance evidence that gets refreshed regularly, designate points of contact for different topics, document procedures for facilitating on-site inspections (access, logistics, technical support), and train staff who may interact with auditors. Set up internal processes for responding to supervisory requests within the required timeframes. You need a triage process for incoming requests, coordination between technical, legal, and management teams, quality review before submission, and tracking of all regulatory interactions and commitments. Run periodic internal compliance assessments that mirror the expected supervisory approach. Finding and fixing gaps before an external inspection is always preferable to having them discovered for you. Maintain a register of all supervisory interactions, findings, corrective actions, and their status. This demonstrates responsiveness and provides a clear audit trail. Engage proactively with your competent authority. Attend their informational events, ask for clarification on expectations, and build a working relationship before you need it.

Evidence Your Auditor Will Request

  • Compliance evidence repository organised by NIS2 control area
  • Designated regulatory liaison or compliance function
  • Inspection readiness procedures and evidence pack
  • Register of supervisory interactions and corrective actions
  • Internal compliance assessment reports

Common Mistakes

  • No preparation for supervisory inspections; scramble to gather evidence upon request
  • Documentation is outdated or does not reflect actual security practices
  • No designated point of contact for regulatory interactions
  • Corrective actions from previous supervisory findings not tracked or completed
  • Adversarial attitude toward supervisors rather than constructive engagement

Related Controls Across Frameworks

Framework Control ID Relationship
ISO 27001 A.5.36 Related
SOC 2 CC4.1 Related

Frequently Asked Questions

How often will essential entities be inspected?
It varies by Member State and sector. Expect proactive supervision that could include regular assessments (potentially annual), ad-hoc inspections triggered by incidents or threat intelligence, and periodic security audits. The key point is that inspections can happen at any time, so you need to be ready continuously.
What is the difference between supervision of essential and important entities?
Essential entities face proactive, ex-ante supervision, meaning inspections can happen without any prior indication of problems. Important entities face reactive, ex-post supervision, where investigations are triggered by evidence of non-compliance. The substantive requirements are the same for both, but the supervisory intensity is significantly different.

Track NIS2 compliance in one place

AuditFront helps you manage every NIS2 control, collect evidence, and stay audit-ready.

Start Free Assessment